When looking at how Stroud’s history information boards portray the
history of Stroud, we could do worse than relocate Bill Schwarz’s observation
from Camden to Stroud (foreword to Raphael Samuel’s Theatres of Memory): ‘… the past has almost caught up with the present’.
I say this because Stroud’s past been partly press-ganged on these boards to
serve the needs of the present: tourists and visitors, spend your money,
please.
But only partly press-ganged. The past still exists as a heritage tale
on these boards and these boards help us individually make sense of what
happened in our town. Bill Schwarz again: ‘The starting point of Theatres of Memory … is that history is
not the prerogative of the historian … As readers of Theatres of Memory will know … Samuel is less preoccupied with the
procedures of mainstream or professional history … he is engaged by the
‘unofficial knowledges’ that give form to the popular articulations of the past
and present’.
So what ‘heritage ’do we find on these information boards? And might
we re-write it?
Samuel wrote how ‘heritage’ can become ‘an expressive totality, a
seamless web … systemic, projecting a unified set of meanings which are
impervious to challenge – what Umberto Eco calls ‘hyper-reality … a ‘closed
story’, i.e. a fixed narrative which allows of neither subtext nor counter-readings.’
So, he contended, be suspicious of professional historians: they so often
‘suppress the authorial ‘I’ so that the evidence appears to itself’; but, ‘History
is an allegorical as well as … a mimetic art … Like allegorists, historians are
adept at discovering a hidden or half-hidden order. We find occult meanings in
apparently simple truths … the historian’s ‘reading’ of the evidence could be
seen as an essay in make believe … an exercise in the story-teller’s arts …’
So, let’s examine the official heritage of Stroud, via textual selections
from the official heritage information boards:
Allegorical? Mimetic? Mythic?
Whose allegory, mimesis and myth?
What did it say in Nineteen
Eighty Four?
‘Who controls the past controls the future: who controls the present
controls the past.’
Subsequent posts will deconstruct Stroud’s heritage boards; after
that, the next series of posts will offer an alternative view of Stroud’s ‘heritage’.
No comments:
Post a Comment