Capitalism
and Slavery made its first appearance during the
Second World War, but as Colin A. Palmer put it in his introduction to the 1972
publication: ‘Few modern historical works have enjoyed the enduring
intellectual impact and appeal of Eric William’s Capitalism and Slavery.’ Having
just read it, I can see what he means – but with one caveat: the book has a
visceral impact too. It makes you angry.
The opening chapter looks at the rising use
of indentured white servants in the colonies of the West Indies and mainland
America in the 17th century – ‘more than a quarter of a million …
during the colonial period’. Others
forcibly transported included convicts, Quakers, Jacobites and Irish resisters,
but the Royal African Company had shown the economic success of using slave
labour by the end of that century, and the die was cast. So, for Eric Williams, economics was the
reason for slavery, not climate and associated racialist thinking. That
racialist ideology and justification for slavery: ‘hair, colour and dentifrice,
his “subhuman” characteristics were only the later rationalization to justify a
simple economic fact’.
The second chapter looks at the development
of the slave trade – ‘it has been estimated that the total import of slaves
into all the British colonies between 1680 and 1786 was over two million’.
Britain dominated the world slave trade, and even carried slaves into the ports
of rival sugar islands owned by the French and Spanish. The monarchy was
involved right from the beginning: Elizabeth with John Hawkins, then the
Company of Royal Adventurers and the Royal African Company. The eighteenth and
nineteenth centuries saw the opposition of George the Third to abolition
(‘according to Wilberforce’) whilst the Duke of Clarence (the future William
the Fourth) ‘attacked Wilberforce as either a fanatic or a hypocrite’. As
regards the Church of England, ‘The bells of the Bristol churches pealed
merrily on the news of the rejection by Parliament of Wilberforce’s bill for
the abolition of the slave trade.’ Quakers, too, were initially prominently and
widely involved in the slave trade, the Barclays and Barings being two easily
recognizable names.
Chapters three and four look at commerce and
the triangular trade: ‘By 1750, there was hardly a trading or a manufacturing
town in England which was not in some way connected with the triangular or
direct colonial trade.’ The wool trade, textiles, ironware, copperware,
earthenware, shipping and timber, the growth of ports such as Bristol and
Liverpool, banking, James Watt, Matthew Boulton and the steam engine, Lloyds
and insurance, guns, handcuffs, fetters, chains, padlocks, the growth of
Manchester and ‘Cottonopolis’, the growth of sugar refining, rum distilling,
the growth of the metallurgical trades and Birmingham …
Chapter the fifth looks at the West India
Interest: ‘Our tobacco colonies send us home no such wealthy planters as we see
frequently arrive from our sugar islands’ (Adam Smith). This wealth also meant
seats in both houses of parliament, and a solid opposition to abolition – until
the 1832 Reform Act.
The next chapter looks at the American
Revolution (or ‘War of Independence’ as I was taught aged 14); Williams saw the
revolution’s consequences as a further step towards the end of mercantilism and
monopoly, and a further step towards free trade: a suspended step towards abolition
and a blow for the West India interest. After 1783, the French islands in the
West Indies began to show a decided superiority in sugar production, on top of
which, the British government’s colonial attentions turned east to India; and
so a slow acceptance of the possibility of the abolition of the slave trade
began to grow, as free trade began to replace mercantilist monopoly as the
dominant ideology in an industrializing Britain. In addition, the loss of the
American colonies meant far fewer slaves and slave owners to think about financially
– as Thomas Clarkson wrote in 1788: “As long as America was our own, there was
no chance that a minister would have attended to the groans of the sons and
daughters of Africa …’
Williams then goes on to look at the
development of British capitalism between 1783 and 1833: ‘Britain’s mechanized
might was making the whole world her footstool.’ In this new economic context,
the West Indies were becoming an anachronism. Attacks on slavery, the slave
trade and preferential sugar duties would consequently follow – the
abolitionists, free traders, the East India Company, laissez-faire, the rise of
a capitalist middle class, cheaper sugar from Brazil, Mauritius and Cuba, the
182 Reform Act, the withering protectionist zeitgeist … the seats in the House
of Commons bought with West Indies money and resistance in the House of Lords
would no longer suffice.
So, British industrial capitalism turned
against the West Indies; ‘The steam engine and the cotton gin turned
Manchester’s indifference into outright hostility.’ Just as cotton-Manchester,
so ironmaster-Birmingham, so steel-Sheffield, so woolen Bradford and the West
Riding, so even Liverpool (to some degree) and Glasgow, so even the shipping
industry too: ‘Whereas before, in the eighteenth century, every vested interest
in England was lined up on the side of monopoly and the colonial system; after
1783, every one of those interests came out against monopoly and the West
Indian slave system.’
The tenth chapter of the book on the
“commercial part of the nation” reiterates that ‘The capitalists had first
encouraged West Indian slavery and then helped to destroy it.’ But …
capitalists still traded with Brazil (a sugar and slaving nation), even after
parliament abolished the slave trade in 1807: sugar, manacles, fetters, cotton,
insurance, banks; that is why some interests in Britain questioned the role of
the Royal Navy in suppressing the slave trade off the African coast. Then, of
course, there was the intimate relationship between Manchester and the slave
owning southern cotton states of the USA – as the Times commented in 1857: ‘We
know that for all mercantile purposes England is one of the States, and that,
in effect, we are partners with the Southern planter’; it is no wonder therefore
that many voices argued for recognition of the Confederacy during the American
Civil War.
The eleventh chapter looks at ‘The “Saints”
and Slavery’: ‘one of the greatest propaganda movements of all time. The
humanitarians were the spearhead of the onslaught which destroyed the West
Indian system and freed the Negro. But their importance has been seriously
misunderstood and grossly exaggerated’. Williams pointed out how some of the
abolitionists (and indeed the ‘Clapham Sect’) had some financial connection to
the East India Company and how emancipation became a goal only after 1823 – it
was the 1831 general election that finally highlighted slavery in the West
Indies; but, of course, for Williams, it was the dynamic of British capitalism
that ended slavery.
The penultimate chapter is entitled ‘The
Slaves and Slavery”, in which the author tells us how the British government
pursued a policy of amelioration of the slaves’ position, after 1823, rather
than emancipation (prohibition of the flogging of female slaves and the’ Negro
Sunday Market’, for example); but. needless to say, any proposals were seen as
an attack on the rights of property by the slave owners. They went further,
arguing that this governmental approach was only encouraging resistance and impatience
on the part of the slaves: ‘The Maroons of Jamaica and the Bush Negroes of
British Guiana were runaway slaves who had extracted treaties from the British
Government and lived independently in their mountain fastnesses of jungle
retreats. They were standing examples to the slaves of the British West Indies
of one road to freedom’. There was also the spectre for slave owners of the
black revolt in the French colony of Saint Domingue and the formation of the
independent republic of Haiti in 1804. And, revolts duly followed: British
Guiana 1808; Barbados 1816; British Guiana again in 1823 (‘God had made them of
the same flesh and blood as the whites … they should be free’ was the slave
stand as the revolt spread through secret design through fifty plantations.);
Jamaica 1824; Antigua 1831, and then ‘The climax came with a revolt in Jamaica
during the Christmas holidays’. Williams’ conclusion was that by 1833,
emancipation was inevitable – either from above or below: ‘Economic change, the
decline of the monopolists, the development of capitalism, the humanitarian
agitation in British churches, contending perorations in the halls of
Parliament, had now reached their completion in the determination of the slaves
themselves to be free. The Negroes had been stimulated to freedom by the very
wealth which their labour had created,’
No comments:
Post a Comment